Monday, September 28, 2009
IBM Introduces New PowerPC CPU Core
The most similar CPUs to the 476FP are the e500mc from Freescale and the CPU used in RMI's XLP832. To conserve power, Freescale limits the speed of the e500 to 1.5GHz in 45nm, and it can issue only two instructions per cycle. Interestingly, both the 476FP and the e500mc incorporate floating-point units. The XLP's CPU is billed as running at up to 2GHz. It's a four-issue machine and thus likely to deliver similar single-thread performance as the 476FP. Being multithreaded, it has the potential for greater throughput than the 476FP, however.
Among licensable CPU cores, the 476FP is most similar to ARM's Cortex-A9. Both IBM and ARM claim their processors achieve the same performance per MHz on small benchmarks. The processors have a similar number of pipeline stages, can issue a similar number of maximum instructions per cycle, and have similar branch prediction. The 476FP is likely to perform better on most real-world code. The A9 cannot sustain its peak issue rate because it can only decode two instructions per cycle, and the 476FP can issue more integer instructions per cycle. The A9, however, supports ARM's Neon instructions, which give it an edge for multimedia applications.
Chip designers seeking a fast CPU for integration in their ASICs and ASSPs will find the 476FP the top choice. Its PowerPC compatibility makes it particularly well suited to communications and enterprise applications where the architecture has a strong presence. A key ingredient in LSI's multicore architecture, the 476FP will distinguish LSI from its competitors. --Joe
Joseph Byrne, senior analyst
Get the complete details on the new LSI platform (two separate slide presentations) in the Linley Tech Processor Conference proceedings (free download)
Monday, September 21, 2009
ST-Ericsson Revamps Connectivity Portfolio
Friday, September 4, 2009
Multicore Mania Coming Soon
The consensus for the past few years has been that multicore microprocessors provide the path to higher performance. Still, it came as a surprise to me when putting together the program for the Linley Tech Processor Conference how many talks discuss multicore processing—about two-thirds of the 20+ presentations.
By looking at parallel programming, MIPS is demonstrating that the people who understand multicore best are software programmers. Continuous Computing and Enea are presenting their software solutions to systems designers seeking to harness multicore processors.
In summary, the multicore approach is not just for high-end implementations; it is for a wide spectrum of designs. The challenge of using multicore processors remains, but software suppliers are easing the transition from the single-core to the multicore era. --Joe
